About this post: http://www.marco.org/980434663. you seem to not mention that Palm always had a touch screen, you just needed stylus. You also didn’t mention that Samsung had a tablet, Samsung Q1. Back then, they were marketed as Ultra portable PCs. None the less, still a decent post. oh, that really wasn’t a question so … umm … how is your day?

missu asked: About this post: http://www.marco.org/980434663. you seem to not mention that Palm always had a touch screen, you just needed stylus. You also didn't mention that Samsung had a tablet, Samsung Q1. Back then, they were marketed as Ultra portable PCs. None the less, still a decent post. oh, that really wasn't a question so ... umm ... how is your day?

Good, thanks. Hope you’re having a great day as well.

I don’t consider stylus-based screens “touchscreens” — they’re more like press-screens, working on the pressure of a fine-tipped instrument like a stylus or fingernail.

And while tablet technology has been around forever, it has never been done well enough or compellingly enough to sell a nontrivial number of units and build up a meaningful installed base — until the iPad.

Answers

About